A Call to Action: Using Curriculum Mapping at Four Medical Schools in Massachusetts to Advance Serious Illness Communication Training in Undergraduate Medical Education.

Background: Practicing physicians require serious illness communication (SIC) skills to ensure high-quality, humanistic care for patients and families as they face life-changing medical decisions. However, a majority of U.S. medical schools do not require formal training in SIC and fail to provide students deliberate practice before graduation. The Massachusetts Medical Schools' Collaborative was created to ensure that students receive foundational SIC training in undergraduate medical education. This Collaborative developed a curriculum-mapping tool to assess SIC at four medical schools. Objective: We aimed to understand existing educational activities across four medical schools and identify opportunities to build longitudinal, developmentally based curricular threads in SIC. Design: From July 2019 to April 2021, faculty, staff, and medical students assessed current educational activities related to five core competencies in SIC, adapted for students from national competencies for palliative medicine fellows, using a curriculum mapping tool. Measurements: The group selected 23 keywords and collected metrics to describe the timing, instruction and assessment for each school's educational activities. Results: On average, there were only 40 hours of required curricula in SIC over four years. Over 80% of relevant SIC hours occurred as elective experiences, mostly during the postclerkship phase, with limited capacity in these elective experiences. Only one school had SIC educational activities during the clerkship phase when students are developing clinical competencies. Assessment methods focused on student participation, and no school-assessed clinical performance in the clerkship or postclerkship phase. Conclusions: Medical schools are failing to consistently train and ensure basic competency in effective, compassionate SIC. Curriculum mapping allows schools to evaluate their current state on a particular topic such as SIC, ensure proper assessment, and evaluate curricular changes over time. Through the deliberate inclusion of SIC competencies in longitudinal curriculum design, we can fill this training gap and create best practices in undergraduate medical education.

The Tween Years: Thriving as a Mid-Career Academic Hospice and Palliative Medicine Clinician.

In the young and rapidly evolving field of hospice and palliative medicine (HPM), the transition from early to mid-career can be a precarious time. The high rates of burnout and low rates of work-life balance and satisfaction found in mid-career jeopardize our field's ability to maintain a healthy workforce. In this series, we present three cases that highlight common issues encountered during the early to mid-career transition in academic HPM and present several strategies for navigating challenges. A web of mentors/connections, academic map, and continuing education to enhance teaching skills are several concrete tools explored. To sustain a robust HPM workforce, such practical and structured supports during the particularly challenging mid-career transition are crucial.

Development of Objectives to Inform a National Standardized Primary Palliative Care Curriculum for Health Professions Students.

Introduction: Despite recent educational advances, the need for a national standardized primary palliative care curriculum for health professions students remains evident. Methods: An interprofessional leadership team developed a set of core learning objectives built on previously published competencies. A survey was then sent to palliative care experts for feedback and consensus. Results: Twenty-eight of 31 objectives met a 75% consensus threshold, 2 were combined with others, and 12 were refined based on survey feedback. Discussion: With interprofessional input at all stages, we finalized a comprehensive list of 26 learning objectives for a primary palliative care curriculum targeting health professions students. These objectives will be widely available through an online course but can also be adopted for use by individual educators across health professions institutions. These objectives and related curriculum are critical to producing practice-ready clinicians who are prepared to care for the burgeoning population of seriously ill patients.

Palliative sedation therapy for terminal movement disorders.

Palliative sedation therapy (PST) can be a challenging area of palliative medicine because of the complex ethical considerations involved. PST is a medical therapy used for refractory symptoms in terminally ill patients and is often considered ethically justified due to the principle of double effect. Even in cases where PST is clearly indicated such as refractory cancer pain, there is potential for moral distress among clinicians. Here, we present a unique case in which multiple therapeutic options were limited in a patient with overlapping diagnoses of catatonia, medication-induced extrapyramidal symptoms, and dementia with Lewy bodies. We review how existing frameworks can be applied to similar situations and offer practical strategies to support medical decision-making regarding PST and reduce the risk of moral distress among clinicians.

Paving the way for universal medical student training in serious illness communication: the Massachusetts Medical Schools' Collaborative.

BACKGROUND: Patients with serious illness look to their clinicians for discussion and guidance on high-stakes treatment decisions, which are complex, emotional and value-laden. However, required training in serious illness communication is rare in U.S. medical schools, with efforts at curricular reform stymied by competing institutional demands, lack of resources and accreditation requirements. We describe an approach to building and scaling medical student training in serious illness communication through the creation of a statewide collaborative of medical schools. METHODS: The Massachusetts Medical Schools' Collaborative is a first-of-its-kind group that promotes longitudinal, developmentally-based curricula in serious illness communication for all students. Convened externally by the Massachusetts Coalition for Serious Illness Care, the collaborative includes faculty, staff, and students from four medical schools. RESULTS: The collaborative started with listening to member's perspectives and collectively developed core competencies in serious illness communication for implementation at each school. We share early lessons on the opportunities, challenges and sustainability of our statewide collective action to influence curricular reform, which can be replicated in other topic areas. CONCLUSIONS: Our next steps include curriculum mapping, student focus groups and faculty development to guide successful and enduring implementation of the competencies to impact undergraduate medical education in Massachusetts and beyond.

Improving Serious Illness Communication: Testing the Serious Illness Care Program with Trainees.

BACKGROUND: Early conversations about patients' goals and values improve care, but clinicians struggle to conduct them. The systems-based Serious Illness Care Program (SICP) helps clinicians have more, better, and earlier conversations. Central to this approach is a clinician conversation guide for patient encounters. While the SICP works for practicing clinicians, it has not been tested with medical trainees. INTERVENTION: We adapted the SICP training to emphasize assessing prognostic awareness and responding to emotion. We developed a 2.5-hour SICP workshop for medical students and medical interns that included large- and small-group work, practice with an actor, and interdisciplinary clinician facilitators. We trained 81 students and 156 interns and obtained anonymous quantitative and qualitative feedback. OUTCOMES: Eighty-six percent of students and 91% of residents rated the session as "very good" or "excellent" and >90% of all learners would either recommend this training or intended to apply this to their practice. Post-session learner confidence increased in all communication skills. Learners said the training provided a helpful framework and useful language for these conversations. Resident documentation of serious illness conversations in the medical record increased dramatically during the year following training commencement. CONCLUSIONS: Grounded in principles of adult learning theory, this training was rated highly by trainees and resulted in demonstrable practice change. These early learners were more flexible and willing to try this approach than practicing clinicians who tend to resist or revert to old habits. A Guide represents a new paradigm for teaching communication skills and is valued by early learners.

Neurology clinicians' views on palliative care communication: "How do you frame this?"

BACKGROUND: The communication process of preparing patients and families facing progressive neurodegenerative diseases for future illness has not been empirically elucidated; the goal of this qualitative study was to explore neurology interdisciplinary health professionals' communication experiences, including current approaches, facilitators, and challenges. METHODS: Three focus groups were conducted with 22 clinicians representing a range of health professions from several multidisciplinary neurology outpatient clinics at a large academic medical center. A thematic analysis approach was used to develop a coding structure and identify overarching themes. RESULTS: Neurology clinicians highlighted that in their practice, (1) conversations are triggered by acute events and practical needs; (2) conversations occur routinely but are rarely documented; (3) loss of patient capacity and resultant surrogate decision-making can be ethically fraught, especially in times of family conflict; (4) prognostic uncertainty, unfamiliarity with disease trajectories, and patient or surrogate avoidance pose communication challenges; and (5) generalist- and specialty-level palliative care roles should be better defined. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for a systematic, structured approach to communication that can be applied early in the disease trajectory and considered when developing integrated neuro-palliative care programs.

Integration of a palliative care specialist in an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis clinic: Observations from one center.

Palliative care specialists can aid in the care of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). In this article, we describe our 1-year experience incorporating a palliative care specialist into the ALS multidisciplinary team. We describe our integration model, patient selection, and visit content. Of 500 total clinic patients, 74 (14.8%) were seen by the palliative care specialist in 1 year. Referral was most often triggered by advance care planning needs (91%). In the initial visit with the palliative care specialist, topics most frequently covered included goals of care (84%), anxiety/depression (35%), and medical decision-making about feeding tubes (27%) or tracheostomy (31%). Symptom management comprised a relatively small number of the visits, and duration of visits was limited by patient fatigue. Patients with complex goals of care may benefit from the input of a palliative care specialist, and unique integration models may help to facilitate care delivery. Muscle Nerve 60: 137-140, 2019.

Prognosis, Communication, and Advance Care Planning in Heart Failure: A Module for Students, Residents, Fellows, and Practicing Clinicians.

INTRODUCTION: The increasing prevalence, high symptom burden, and medical advances that often prolong the advanced phase of heart failure mandate an organized and thoughtful approach to medical decision making. However, many clinicians have difficulty discussing prognosis and goals of care with patients. Barriers include disease- and therapy-specific prognostication challenges in heart failure and a lack of evidence-based primary palliative care education initiatives. METHODS: In response, we developed this 45-minute training module, which consists of a case-based small-group session and a communication guide. The curriculum highlights prognostication challenges in heart failure and introduces an illness trajectory-based framework to cue iterative goals of care conversations. RESULTS: We piloted this learning module with 46 internal medicine residents and interdisciplinary palliative care fellows in groups of three to 15 and obtained anonymous quantitative and qualitative postsession learner survey data to examine feasibility and acceptability. Trainees rated the session highly. One hundred percent of learners either strongly agreed or agreed the session was clinically useful. Learners unanimously found the teaching methods effective, and most felt they could easily apply these skills to their clinical work. In open-ended feedback, learners said the session gave them a better understanding of the heart failure illness trajectory, an improved framework for discussing goals of care with heart failure patients, and specific language to use when having these discussions. DISCUSSION: This module represents a new paradigm for teaching both prognostication and advance care planning in heart failure in which illness trajectory guides timing and content of goals of care conversations.